Ponencia en el IV Congreso Internacional ,V Nacional y VI Regional "Violencia Maltrato y abuso" Universidad del Este, La Plata dia 16 de noviembre de 2013.- Publicada en Revista de Pensamiento penal.
pagina web http://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/articulos/represion-ilegal-ninos-victimas-incesto-procesos-judiciales
pagina web http://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/articulos/represion-ilegal-ninos-victimas-incesto-procesos-judiciales
_________________________________________________________
Desde mi experiencia y espacio jurisdiccional como Juez con incumbencia en conflictos de Familia observo que a medida que han aumentado las denuncias de incesto y violencia de género aparecen “modas” en el Derecho y en Tribunales. El Síndrome de Alienación Parental - SAP, la revinculación o exigencia de contacto del niño con el padre denunciado y la custodia compartida forzada . Todas con un envase : “el Superior Interés del Niño” pero con una intención oculta: acallar y amedrentar a las víctimas de violencia de género y de incesto- mujeres y niños (1)
Su metodología es la de toda mentira: la abstracción, la complejidad de sus postulados y la confusión. Desplazan con postulados sin sustento científico concepciones de Derecho Natural : que el niño no miente, que debe protegerse al mas vulnerable , que los afectos no deben ser forzados y que la madre es la que cuida a la cria .
Y para su aplicación utilizan la represión de la voluntad y la integridad emocional y física del niño y de la madre protectora que le ha creido y denuncia al hombre incestuoso .
Son estrategias defensivas de hombres pedófilos y violentos que amparados en el título de “padre” logran el aval judicial para forzar el contacto con el niño , aislarlo de la madre cuidadora. Logran desarticular esa protección materna, contenedora del niño víctima de incesto. Se la estigmatiza como “loca” o “manipuladora” y permite al hombre pedófilo o violento invertir roles, asignándose a si mismo el de víctima , contraatacando a la madre protectora y en ella al niño y su relato del incesto.- El hombre pedófilo con estas defensas logra invisibilizarse en lo que es : un perverso y un delincuente.-
Los padres acusados de incesto o abuso sexual infantil NUNCA reconocen los hechos. Singer-Hussey (1993) definen a los pedófilos como “sofisticados, calculadores y pacientes” (2) y Cecilia López destaca en ellos la soberbia. (3)
Los hombres pedófilos y padres incestuosos ( como también los violentos) son meticulosos cuidadores de su imagen , porque los favorece y los “SALVA”. (4)
La característica común de estos hombres en los procesos judiciales y según mi propia experiencia es su “activismo” obsesivo con actuaciones y términos de defensa de gran agresividad hacia la madre cuidadora que ha denunciado y hacia todo operador judicial ( incluso juez ) que tienda a creer el relato del niño y la denuncia de la madre . La psiquiatra española Consuelo Barea los describe como “acosadores legales” que usan el sistema legal y judicial como un campo de batalla (5)
Favorece a su estrategia de ataque la fragilidad emocional de las madres protectoras , quienes en su mayoría han sido victimas de violencia de género y que por el stress post traumático generado por el incesto develado suelen dar la imagen de mujeres emocionalmente alteradas, las “locas” ; situación que ante la mirada ajena permite su estigmatizacion . Más aun cuando el hombre violento o pedófilo brinda ( con toda intención ) una imagen opuesta y seductora socialmente.-
A esta realidad se suma el notable desfasaje entre las defensas técnicas de ambas partes.
Los padres denunciados de incesto suelen tener en la inmensa mayoría de los casos defensas de abogados particulares, de buenos estudios que al ser bien pagos actúan con especial motivación económica y mantienen constantemente activo el proceso con innumerables presentaciones incidencias, recursos etc.
Las madres protectoras y sus niños víctimas del incesto por el contrario en la inmensa mayoría de los casos, como suelen ser víctimas de violencia económica por parte del denunciado, no tienen acceso más que a defensas gratuitas oficiales o abogados que saben que sus expectativas económicas no son muchas o con una limitada capacitación en el tema. Debe remarcarse que en estas problemáticas del abuso sexual infantil resulta indispensable la capacitación , especialmente en otras disciplinas ( psicología, psiquiatría etc.) para que la defensa de las víctimas sea efectiva y su denuncia penal no quede impune .-
El relato del niño suele ser el gran indicador de la existencia del incesto y su relevancia probatoria es determinante. Por eso estas estrategias de defensa usadas por el padre incestuoso y violento tienen como fin último el desmantelar esa prueba fundamental
Hay que CREER AL NIÑO - yo como Juez asumo esa postura - dándole a su palabra la envergadura de plena prueba, haciendo aplicación efectiva del interés superior del niño y su derecho a ser escuchado .-
En ningún proceso es más indispensable efectivizar este derecho consagrado por la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño ( art.3 y 12 CDN) como en estos procesos ( civil y penal) donde ese niño ha sido víctima de delito.
Y creer no es “comprobar” .-
La Profesora experta en victimología Hilda Marchiori (6) resalta la importancia de la credibilidad del relato del niño como ayuda esencial en su recuperación emocional y social. Hace a su dignidad, al respeto de su persona , la comprensión de su padecimiento y la posibilidad de tratamiento como sobreviviente de un hecho traumático .
Tanto Marchiori como Irene Intebi (7) coinciden en la necesidad que el niño sea creído cuando relata el incesto o el abuso sexual. Y Ruth Teubal por su parte afirma la importancia determinante para el niño que su madre le haya creído y decida protegerlo : “…El rol de la madre cuando el niño resuelve relatar el incesto es determinante, siendo su posición frente a esa revelación clave para el futuro de la salud mental de su hijo..” (8) Por eso ordenar judicialmente la revinculación de un niño con su padre denunciado por incesto es un acto de represión judicial e ilegal . Es un acto judicial contrario a todas las normas nacionales e internacionales creadas en protección a los derechos humanos de los niños y las mujeres víctimas de violencia. Porque no puede soslayarse que en la mayoría de los casos la antesala del incesto ha sido la violencia de género.-
La evolución en el ámbito de los derechos humanos del niño compele a que los mecanismos judiciales sean cada vez más directos y claros en sus efectos .
El niño no miente. La verdad está siempre en el niño. El niño debe ser cuidado de toda posibilidad de peligro y debe ser una de las primeras medidas el impedimento de contacto del niño con el padre denunciado por incesto.- Es hacer efectiva la Convención de los Derechos del Niño en el proceso judicial y es privilegiar el principio de inocencia en el NIÑO no -como en la práctica judicial penal se da - del adulto denunciado .
En las denuncias de abuso sexual infantil e incesto son los niños los relatores del hecho y suele ser una práctica judicial que deben reiterar su relato innumerables veces porque en realidad NO SON CREIDOS y con la argumentación de la “presunción de inocencia” del agresor se arrincona al niño en un andamiaje procesal que en última instancia parte de una desvalorización de su opinión ( aunque se pregone su derecho a ser oído) y es el adulto agresor quien goza de la presunción de verdad.
Calamandrei (9) dice que el proceso judicial tiene una finalidad y es altísima, la más alta que pueda existir en la vida y se llama JUSTICIA .
Justicia para un niño víctima de incesto o abuso sexual infantil es primero que en el proceso judicial se CREA en su palabra instalando los recaudos para que una vez que relato el abuso se le dé valor de plena prueba del delito. Segundo que se lo proteja de su agresor. Esta es la esfera civil donde debe el juez interviniente dictar toda medida en aras a esa protección efectiva y a evitar todo tipo de contacto con el agresor. Y tercero que aquel que abuso de ese niño no quede impune.
Los procesos judiciales son reflejo de una ideología social subyacente patriarcal. Hay un PRE- JUICIO: el niño miente, inventa, fantasea porque (aunque no se quiera verbalizar) el niño es “tonto” .
La sociedad en su conjunto reniega de la existencia del incesto y los operadores judiciales son espejo de esta concepción social.-
Creer en un niño es adentrarse en la verdad de los abusos sexuales infantiles e incestuosos y su carácter de epidemia social y pareciera que la sociedad teme descubrirla.
Se minimiza el relato del niño con variadas argumentaciones que pretenden en última instancia silenciar el horror, esconder la aviesa intención de volver al niño “al redil” usando todo medio que destruya el valor probatorio de su relato del incesto padecido.-
Es el ejercicio del poder del adulto sobre el niño.
Poder del varón y “pater” sobre el niño y sobre la madre que en la inmensa mayoría de los casos ha sido también víctima de violencia por parte de ese hombre.
El pedido de revinculación del hombre acusado de incesto es su necesidad imperiosa de ser reivindicado ante la sociedad como “padre” y como “inocente” del incesto y además su intento obsesivo de que el niño se retracte de su relato.-
Los pedófilos saben que su escudo de impunidad social está dado en su imagen pública. Por eso su obsesión por su máscara social .
Los pedófilos son impostores de buen comportamiento social.-
Es en este contexto que los denunciados de incesto promueven los pedidos de revinculación y custodia de los niños y que lamentablemente muchos Jueces y otros operadores imponen por la fuerza a esos niños y a sus madres protectoras.-
Detrás de estas metodologías está aunque no sea nombrado el SAP, el Síndrome de Alienación Parental que instala la sospecha sobre la madre protectora y coloca en rol de victima al padre denunciado de incesto. El SAP es el arma estratégica de defensa de los pedófilos denunciados judicialmente creada por Gardner quien “justificaba todas las parafilias- incluyendo la pedofilia, diciendo que están al servicio de ejercitar esta máquina sexual para la procreación de la especie humana” (10) Siniestra metodología defensiva que les ha servido y les sirve para desarticular la prueba esencial del incesto: el relato del niño y la denuncia y cuidado de la madre protectora .
Se fuerza al niño a tener contacto con el agresor por ser padre, se estigmatiza y se castiga a la madre cuidadora y se invisibiliza al hombre incestuoso o violento.
Otro hecho a poner de relevancia: los hombres acusados de incesto JAMAS reconocen nada de lo que se los acusa. Verbalizan en forma incansable que su único interés es el hijo pero atacan su palabra solapadamente y la menosprecian y avanzan aun con la negativa verbalizada del niño a verlos. Nada los detiene en su pedido.
Estas metodologías del SAP en los procesos judiciales de familia suelen operarse en muchos casos con el uso de la fuerza pública en un atropello flagrante a la integridad emocional y a la dignidad del niño que se esgrime proteger. Son “secuestros judiciales” de niños
La evolución internacional en el tema de los derechos humanos del niño compele a que los mecanismos judiciales sean cada vez màs directos y claros en sus efectos: creer y proteger al niño . Privilegiar el cuidado del niño por sobre el interés del padre ante las denuncias de violencia e incesto.-
Las decisiones judiciales que ordenan revinculaciones o custodias en estos casos colocan al juez y todos los operadores que las promueven en situación de cómplices del delito aunque no se quiera visualizar porque revictimizan institucionalmente a las víctimas .- Expresa Jorge Volnovich que la victimización es horrible, pero la revictimización es fatal en el campo del abuso sexual infantil ; la revictimizacion es algo aún mas grave que la propia victimización en estos casos” (11)
El juez que ordena la revinculación de ese niño o la custodia compartida forzando su contacto con el denunciado de incesto abandona a su suerte a ese niño, lo desmiente en los hechos, menosprecia su palabra y cuestiona su dignidad separándolo a su vez del referente contenedor que le creyó y lo protegió, su madre.-
Perverso mensaje recibirá para el resto de su vida ese niño que vera que de nada sirvió hablar y que el perverso padre puede seguir su vida sin consecuencias ni condena alguna ni social ni judicial.-
Deberíamos preguntarnos como sociedad ¿ Qué pasa con esos niños y su futuro adulto?: Serán sobrevivientes de la iniquidad más trágica.-
Ser padre es el resultado de una construcción con actos de ternura, de amor, ser padre no es un título, es un logro de vida. Un hombre que avanza con su sexualidad adulta sobre el niño que debiera cuidar no es “padre” es un monstruo con máscara humana.-
Los niños son hacedores de la mejor humanidad, los niños son la fuente primigenia de sabiduría, en ellos está el sentido de la existencia humana. Destruyéndolos a ellos se destruye lo mejor, la esperanza, la esfera donde el hombre es “casi perfecto”.
Y el abuso sexual infantil es la destrucción de un niño. “Te volverás hueco. Te exprimiremos hasta vaciarte y entonces te llenaremos con nosotros mismo” frase de George Orwell en su libro “ 1984 “ citada por Leonard Shengold, psicoanalista norteamericano, profesor de psiquiatría de la Universidad de Nueva York cuando considera al Abuso sexual infantil entre los que llama “ asesinatos de almas “ un término dramático que usa para designar actos que son intentos deliberados de erradicar o poner en riesgo la identidad separada de otra persona. (12)
El abuso sexual de niños es el avance del poder adulto sobre el niño como germen de revolución, porque cada niño lleva en sí mismo ínsita la esperanza de un cambio, cada niño es un humano nuevo con una mirada nueva, y el poder en el mundo teme esa posibilidad.
El abuso sexual de un niño es la destrucción de los más auténtico de ese niño, el quiebre de su libertad primigenia.
El mensaje social es claro: nada puedes hacer por ti mismo porque yo como adulto ocupo tu cuerpo, tu conciencia llenándote de culpa, tu esperanza porque nadie te cuida y tu habla porque te encierro prisionero en el secreto: Eso es el abuso sexual infantil.
Una cuestión de poder y el poder del adulto debe seguir vigente aun con su perversa impronta.
Por eso la complicidad silenciosa de la sociedad frente al abuso sexual infantil y el incesto y la complicidad expresa de los resortes de poder institucionales que pretenden acallar y amedrentar a sus víctimas.
Todo niño que nace es un humano libre que conmociona ese poder adulto. El abuso sexual infantil y más aún el incesto busca corromper al niño y su innato germen revolucionario. Por eso hay una cristalización mental de la sociedad en cuanto a los niños: No se les cree.-
Creer no comprobar su palabra como en los hechos sucede. Sobre esta base esta cimentada la impunidad de los abusos sexuales infantiles y del incesto. La sociedad menosprecia la palabra de los niños y se deja seducir por las máscaras sociales que sabe armar el agresor.
Porque resulta “conveniente” al sistema el no creerles. Consumidores sexuales, pedófilos y explotadores sexuales deben seguir siendo impunes y amparándose en las sombras. Y en este siniestro cometido es necesario desarticular todo intento de hacer valer el relato de los niños víctimas de violaciones, abuso sexual infantil e incesto. Hay que desacreditar y hay que “poner las cosas en orden” La revinculación , el contacto forzado del niño con su agresor y la custodia compartida en estos casos es el modo institucional de hacerlo .
Por eso es indispensable creer niño, cuidarlo de todo peligro y poner la mirada exclusivamente en el agresor de ese niño, el principio de inocencia rige para el niño . Cuando se comience a creer en sus relatos, cuando se respete su dignidad y su dolor habrá menos impunidad, único camino para sanear la sociedad y su futuro hoy desolador.-
Y para concluir y citando a Consuelo Barea Payueta :“… Sólo tendremos esperanza como especie si nos atrevemos a abrir la Caja de Pandora. Sólo podremos establecer un nuevo orden igualitario, una mayoría de edad democrática, un mundo que respete los derechos humanos, si nos atrevemos a descubrir la violencia que se ejerce sobre las mujeres y los niños, la invisibilidad de quien ejerce la violencia impunemente, sólo mostrando públicamente quien es y lo que hace, es la auténtica Caja de Pandora y sólo habrá esperanza si la abrimos…” (13)
BIBLIOGRAFIA .-
(1) el término niño se usa sin distinción de genero y contemplando en su concepto al adolescente. ,.-
(2)citado por Irene Intebi “ El abuso sexual en las mejores familias” Ed.Granica )
(3) dice María Cecilia López en su libro - “Abuso Sexual. Como prevenirlo como detectarlo Consultorio Paidos.- “…Los psicólogos saben que una de las principales características de los pedófilos es la soberbia. Este tipo de perversos cree que nadie podría a llegar a ser tan inteligente como ellos y que, de proponérselo podrían llegar a ser capaces de engañar a cualquiera puesto que subestiman…” )
(4) cita Irene Intebi en op.citado pg.111 : “. El especialista en tratamiento de ofensores sexuales William E. Prendergast comenta “ la mayoría de los abusadores que conocí tanto en mi práctica privada como en mi experiencia institucional eran personas agradables: educados, caballeros, cooperadores, de buen comportamiento y muy trabajadores. Hacen lo posible para agradar y ser aceptados…”
(5) Consuelo Barea Payueta “El maltratador como ex marido y como padre” Libro segundo de la Trilogia “ Y te quitarè los hijos” Barcelona 1912 pg.82 y ss.)
(6) Marchiori Hilda “Víctimas vulnerables. Niños víctimas de abuso sexual”
(7) Irene Intebi- ( “ El abuso sexual en las mejores familias ” Ed.Granica . ”)- expresa al respecto : “… Para los chicos ¿ Cual es la solución ideal? …que se les crea; que el mundo de los adultos –sobre todo las personas mas allegadas, valide sus percepciones y que tome partido…”
(8) - HOOPER Mary Ann, Madres sobrevivientes del abuso sexual de niños.Buenos Aires.Nueva Vision cit. De Ruth Teubal en su trabajo “ Las Madres frente al abuso sexual infantil intrafamiliar de sus hijos ¿son víctimas ?
(9) Calamandrei “Proceso y Justicia” R.D.Arg. 1952 pg. Tomo 1° pg.18
(10) Sonia Vaccaro- Consuelo Barea “El pretendido Sindrome de Alienación parental” Ed.Desclée de Boruwer , Barcelona 2009 pg.166, 167 y ss. )
(11) VOLNOVICH “Abuso sexual en la infancia 3.- La revictimización Ed.Lumen.Buenos Aires-México 2008)
(12) citado por Irene Intebi en “ Abuso Sexual infantil en las mejores familias”Ed.Granica )
(13) -Sonia Vaccaro- Consuelo Barea “El pretendido Sindrome de Alienación Parental” Ed.Desclée de Brouwer
_________________________________________________________________________________
"Paper presented at the Fourth International Congress Violence, Mistreatment and Abuse
Victimology , Criminology and Gender. A complex trilogy , held in the city of La Plata , Province of Buenos Aires , Argentina , on 14, 15 and 16 November 2013 .
"Illegal Repression " child incest victim in court proceedings - Reunification and other methodologies.
Author : Graciela Dora Jofre . Magistrate Counsel Villa Gesell.
Email: gracieladjofré@gmail.com .
From my experience as a judge in court concerning family conflicts, I have observed an increase in reports of incest and domestic violence to occur in a new fashion in the law and courts. The term Parental Alienation Syndrome ( PAS), reunification or requiring child's contact with the identified abusive father, and forced joint custody is an all-in-one "The Best Interest of the Child" package but with a hidden agenda: to silence and intimidate victims of domestic violence and incest, women and children ( 1)
The methodology is all lies: abstraction, complexity of its postulates and confusion. Motions with arguments are without scientific support or conceptions of natural law such as: the child does not lie, children should be protected because they are more vulnerable, their affections should not be forced and the mother is protecting her offspring.
In these cases, there is the suppression of the will to secure the emotional and physical safety of the child and protective mother who believes the child and denounces the incestuous man.
Those are the defensive strategies of pedophiles and violent men who retain the title of "father" and the judicial endorsement to force contact with the child and isolate the mother who is the caregiver.
They manage to disrupt the maternal protection and contain the child victim of incest. The mother is stigmatized as "crazy" or "manipulative", which allows the pedophile or violent man to reverse roles: assigning himself the victim, striking back at the protective mother and her child and the disclosures of incest. The pedophile, with those defenses, succeeds in making perverse and criminal offenses invisible."
"Paper presented at the Fourth International Congress Violence, Mistreatment and Abuse
Victimology , Criminology and Gender. A complex trilogy , held in the city of La Plata , Province of Buenos Aires , Argentina , on 14, 15 and 16 November 2013 .
"Illegal Repression " child incest victim in court proceedings - Reunification and other methodologies.
Author : Graciela Dora Jofre . Magistrate Counsel Villa Gesell.
Email: gracieladjofré@gmail.com .
_____________________________________________________________________
From my experience as a judge in court concerning family conflicts, I have observed an increase in reports of incest and domestic violence to occur in a new fashion in the law and courts. The term Parental Alienation Syndrome ( PAS), reunification or requiring child's contact with the identified abusive father, and forced joint custody is an all-in-one "The Best Interest of the Child" package but with a hidden agenda: to silence and intimidate victims of domestic violence and incest, women and children ( 1)
The methodology is all lies: abstraction, complexity of its postulates and confusion. Motions with arguments are without scientific support or conceptions of natural law such as: the child does not lie, children should be protected because they are more vulnerable, their affections should not be forced and the mother is protecting her offspring.
In these cases, there is the suppression of the will to secure the emotional and physical safety of the child and protective mother who believes the child and denounces the incestuous man.
Those are the defensive strategies of pedophiles and violent men who retain the title of "father" and the judicial endorsement to force contact with the child and isolate the mother who is the caregiver.
They manage to disrupt the maternal protection and contain the child victim of incest. The mother is stigmatized as "crazy" or "manipulative", which allows the pedophile or violent man to reverse roles: assigning himself the victim, striking back at the protective mother and her child and the disclosures of incest. The pedophile, with those defenses, succeeds in making perverse and criminal offenses invisible."
"Parents accused of incest or child sexual abuse NEVER acknowledge the facts. Singer-Hussey (1993) define the pedophile as "sophisticated, calculating and patient" (2) Cecilia Lopez defines it as “standing in pride”. (3) Pedophiles and incestuous fathers (as well as violent fathers) are meticulous caretakers of their image, because that image is more favorable to save. (4)
The common characteristic of these men in court and in my experience is their obsessive activism in terms of performances and defense by aggression toward caring mothers who have reported and to any judicial operator (including judges) who tend to believe the story of the child and the mother 's complaint. The Spanish psychologist, Consuelo Barea, describes these "legal stalkers" who use the legal and judicial system as a battlefield (5)
They favor a strategy of attacking the emotional fragility of protective mothers, most of whom have been victims of domestic violence, resulting post-traumatic stress and the unveiled incest usually gives the image of emotionally disturbed, "mad" women - a situation that allows others to stigmatize her. Moreover, the man is still intentionally violent or a pedophile with a socially unacceptable behaviors. In this reality, the remarkable gap between the technical defenses on both sides is weighed.
Parents accused of incest often have, in the vast majority of cases, individual defense lawyers, good studies to be well paid acting with special economic motivation and the process kept constantly active with countless incidents, resources presentations etc .
Protective mothers and their children who are victims of incest on the contrary in the vast majority of cases , usually as victims of economic violence by the defendant, but do not have access to free defense officers or lawyers who know their economic expectations – and most have limited training in the subject . It should be noted that these issues of child sexual abuse training is essential , especially in other disciplines for the defense of victims to be effective and to not be left as an unpunished criminal complaint ( psychology, psychiatry etc. .)
The common characteristic of these men in court and in my experience is their obsessive activism in terms of performances and defense by aggression toward caring mothers who have reported and to any judicial operator (including judges) who tend to believe the story of the child and the mother 's complaint. The Spanish psychologist, Consuelo Barea, describes these "legal stalkers" who use the legal and judicial system as a battlefield (5)
They favor a strategy of attacking the emotional fragility of protective mothers, most of whom have been victims of domestic violence, resulting post-traumatic stress and the unveiled incest usually gives the image of emotionally disturbed, "mad" women - a situation that allows others to stigmatize her. Moreover, the man is still intentionally violent or a pedophile with a socially unacceptable behaviors. In this reality, the remarkable gap between the technical defenses on both sides is weighed.
Parents accused of incest often have, in the vast majority of cases, individual defense lawyers, good studies to be well paid acting with special economic motivation and the process kept constantly active with countless incidents, resources presentations etc .
Protective mothers and their children who are victims of incest on the contrary in the vast majority of cases , usually as victims of economic violence by the defendant, but do not have access to free defense officers or lawyers who know their economic expectations – and most have limited training in the subject . It should be noted that these issues of child sexual abuse training is essential , especially in other disciplines for the defense of victims to be effective and to not be left as an unpunished criminal complaint ( psychology, psychiatry etc. .)
The child’s disclosures are usually the great indicator of the existence of incest and its evidentiary relevance is crucial. So these defense strategies used by the incestuous and violent fathers are the ultimate goal of dismantling the fundamental test.
We must BELIEVE THE CHILD .
I assume that position as Judge, giving testimony the full scale test, making effective application of the best interests of children and their right to be heard .
In any process it is essential to effectuate this right enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (art. 3 and 12 CDN ) and these civil and criminal process in which the child has been a victim of crime.
To believe is not to "check ".
The expert in victimology Professor Hilda Marchiori (6 ) highlights the importance of the credibility of the disclosures of the child as an essential aid in their emotional and social recovery. Their dignity means respect for their person, understanding their condition and the possibility of treatment as a survivor of a traumatic event .
We must BELIEVE THE CHILD .
I assume that position as Judge, giving testimony the full scale test, making effective application of the best interests of children and their right to be heard .
In any process it is essential to effectuate this right enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (art. 3 and 12 CDN ) and these civil and criminal process in which the child has been a victim of crime.
To believe is not to "check ".
The expert in victimology Professor Hilda Marchiori (6 ) highlights the importance of the credibility of the disclosures of the child as an essential aid in their emotional and social recovery. Their dignity means respect for their person, understanding their condition and the possibility of treatment as a survivor of a traumatic event .
Both Marchiori and Irene Intebi (7) agree on the need for the child to be believed when remembering and disclosing incest or sexual abuse. Ruth Teubal says the decisive importance to the child is that his mother believes him and will protect him. " ... The role of the mother when the child discloses incest is crucial , as is a key disclosure with reference to the future mental health of your child .. " (8) court order that reunification of a child with his father who is denounced by an act of incest is legal and illegal repression. It is a judicial act contrary to all national and international standards created in the protection of human rights of children and women victims of violence. Because it can not be overlooked, in most cases, the threshold of incest is the same as domestic violence .
Developments in the field of human rights compels children to judicial mechanisms becoming increasingly forthright in their effects.
The child does not lie. The truth is always in the child. The child should be protected from any possibility of danger - which must be one of the first measures of the impairment of child's contact with the father denounced by incest . Implement the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the judicial process and favor the presumption of innocence in the CHILD and non- criminal judicial practice occurs – placing the focus on the adult.
The allegations of child sexual abuse and incest in which children are the speakers of the event and usually a judicial practice in which a child must reiterate his story countless times because they actually ARE NOT believed. In the argument of the "presumption of innocence " the aggressor corners the child in a procedural framework that is ultimately part of a devaluation of the child’s opinion (while the child’s right to be heard is preached) and the adult offender who enjoys the presumption of innocence.
Developments in the field of human rights compels children to judicial mechanisms becoming increasingly forthright in their effects.
The child does not lie. The truth is always in the child. The child should be protected from any possibility of danger - which must be one of the first measures of the impairment of child's contact with the father denounced by incest . Implement the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the judicial process and favor the presumption of innocence in the CHILD and non- criminal judicial practice occurs – placing the focus on the adult.
The allegations of child sexual abuse and incest in which children are the speakers of the event and usually a judicial practice in which a child must reiterate his story countless times because they actually ARE NOT believed. In the argument of the "presumption of innocence " the aggressor corners the child in a procedural framework that is ultimately part of a devaluation of the child’s opinion (while the child’s right to be heard is preached) and the adult offender who enjoys the presumption of innocence.
Calamandrei ( 9) says that the judicial process has a purpose and is very high , the highest that can exist in life and is called JUSTICE .
Justice for a child victim of incest or child sexual abuse is first thing in the judicial process in your word CREA installing the collections to once abuse story is given full value of evidence of the crime . Second that protect you from your abuser . This is the civil sphere where the presiding judge must issue in order to measure all that effective protection and avoid all contact with the aggressor. And third that whoever that child abuse does not go unpunished .
The lawsuits reflect underlying patriarchal social ideology. There is a PRE - TRIAL : the child lie, invent , fantasizes that ( although not want to verbalize ) the child is " silly " .
Society as a whole denies the existence of incest and judicial officers are mirror this social conception. -
To believe in a child is to explore the truth of child sexual abuse and incest and character of social epidemic and it seems that society fears discover .
The story of the child is minimized with various arguments that seek ultimately mute horror, hide malicious intent to return the child " into the fold " using all means to destroy the probative value of his account of incest suffered . -
It is the exercise of the power of the adult over the child.
Male power and " pater " on the child and the mother in the vast majority of cases has also been the victim of violence by the man.
The order rebind the man accused of incest is the urgent need to be claimed before society as " father " and " innocent " of incest and his obsessive also the child retract his story attempt. -
Pedophiles know your Coat of social impunity is given in his public image. Hence his obsession with his social mask.
Pedophiles are impostors of good social behavior. -
It is in this context that the alleged incest promote rebinding orders and custody of the children and unfortunately many Judges and Other impose by force to these children and their protective mothers. -
Behind these methodologies is whether or not he named the SAP , Parental Alienation Syndrome installing the suspicion of the mother and placed in protective role of the father alleged victim of incest. The SAP is the strategic weapon of defense of pedophiles known judicially created by Gardner who " justified all paraphilias , including pedophilia, saying they are serving exercise this sex machine for procreation of the human race " (10 ) Dark methodology defense that has served and serves to disrupt the essential test of incest : the story of the child and care complaint and protective mother .
Forces the child to have contact with the perpetrator being a father , stigmatized and caring mother to be punished and made invisible to incestuous or violent man.
Justice for a child victim of incest or child sexual abuse is first thing in the judicial process in your word CREA installing the collections to once abuse story is given full value of evidence of the crime . Second that protect you from your abuser . This is the civil sphere where the presiding judge must issue in order to measure all that effective protection and avoid all contact with the aggressor. And third that whoever that child abuse does not go unpunished .
The lawsuits reflect underlying patriarchal social ideology. There is a PRE - TRIAL : the child lie, invent , fantasizes that ( although not want to verbalize ) the child is " silly " .
Society as a whole denies the existence of incest and judicial officers are mirror this social conception. -
To believe in a child is to explore the truth of child sexual abuse and incest and character of social epidemic and it seems that society fears discover .
The story of the child is minimized with various arguments that seek ultimately mute horror, hide malicious intent to return the child " into the fold " using all means to destroy the probative value of his account of incest suffered . -
It is the exercise of the power of the adult over the child.
Male power and " pater " on the child and the mother in the vast majority of cases has also been the victim of violence by the man.
The order rebind the man accused of incest is the urgent need to be claimed before society as " father " and " innocent " of incest and his obsessive also the child retract his story attempt. -
Pedophiles know your Coat of social impunity is given in his public image. Hence his obsession with his social mask.
Pedophiles are impostors of good social behavior. -
It is in this context that the alleged incest promote rebinding orders and custody of the children and unfortunately many Judges and Other impose by force to these children and their protective mothers. -
Behind these methodologies is whether or not he named the SAP , Parental Alienation Syndrome installing the suspicion of the mother and placed in protective role of the father alleged victim of incest. The SAP is the strategic weapon of defense of pedophiles known judicially created by Gardner who " justified all paraphilias , including pedophilia, saying they are serving exercise this sex machine for procreation of the human race " (10 ) Dark methodology defense that has served and serves to disrupt the essential test of incest : the story of the child and care complaint and protective mother .
Forces the child to have contact with the perpetrator being a father , stigmatized and caring mother to be punished and made invisible to incestuous or violent man.
Another fact to add relevance : the men accused of incest NEVER recognize anything they are accused. Tirelessly verbalize his only interest is the son but his word covertly attack and belittle and move even with the child verbalized refusal tosee them. Nothing stops on your order.
These methodologies SAP in family court proceedings often operated in many cases with the use of the armed forces in blatant emotional integrity and dignity of the child who wields protect outrage. They are " legal kidnapping " of children .
International developments in the field of human rights compels child to judicial mechanisms become increasingly forthright in its effects: believe and protect the child. Privileging child care for the interest of the parent to allegations of violence and incest. -
The judicial decisions ordering rebinds or custody in these cases the judge and placed all operators who promote them accomplices in the crime situation but not because you want to display revictimizan institutionally victims - . Expresses Jorge Volnovich that victimization is horrible, but revictimization is fatal in the field of child sexual abuse, revictimization is something even more serious than the own victimization in these cases "(11 )
The judge ordering the reconnection of that child or joint custody forcing contact with the alleged incest leave your fate to that child, denies in fact, despises his word and questions his dignity separating it turn referent container believed him and protected him , his mother. -
Kink message will receive for the rest of his life to see that the child was of no talk and perverse parent can go on without any consequences or socially or conviction court . -
We should ask as a society what about those children and their future adult : . They be survivors of the tragic wickedness -
Parenting is the result of a construction with acts of tenderness, love , parenting is not a title , it's a lifetime achievement . A man who moves with her adult sexuality on child care should not " father " is a monster with a human mask . -
Children are the best makers of humanity , children are the ultimate source of wisdom in them is the meaning of human existence . Maybe destroying them is destroyed, the hope , the area where the man is "almost perfect."
And child sexual abuse is the destruction of a child. " You'll go through. We shall squeeze up to empty and then we shall fill you with ourselves " phrase from George Orwell's book" 1984 " cited by Leonard Shengold American psychoanalyst , professor of psychiatry at New York University when considered child sexual abuse among calling " murders of souls " a dramatic term used to describe acts that are deliberate attempts to eradicate or compromise the separate identity of another person . ( 12)
Sexual abuse of children is the advancement of adult power over the child as a seed of revolution, because each child carries within itself ínsita hope for change, every child is a new man with a new look, and power in the world fears that possibility.
Sexual abuse of a child is the destruction of the most authentic of that child, the breakdown of its original release.
The social message is clear : nothing can do for yourself as an adult because I occupy your body, filling you with guilt conscience , your hope because nobody cares and your speech because you prisoner confinement in secret: That is child sexual abuse.
These methodologies SAP in family court proceedings often operated in many cases with the use of the armed forces in blatant emotional integrity and dignity of the child who wields protect outrage. They are " legal kidnapping " of children .
International developments in the field of human rights compels child to judicial mechanisms become increasingly forthright in its effects: believe and protect the child. Privileging child care for the interest of the parent to allegations of violence and incest. -
The judicial decisions ordering rebinds or custody in these cases the judge and placed all operators who promote them accomplices in the crime situation but not because you want to display revictimizan institutionally victims - . Expresses Jorge Volnovich that victimization is horrible, but revictimization is fatal in the field of child sexual abuse, revictimization is something even more serious than the own victimization in these cases "(11 )
The judge ordering the reconnection of that child or joint custody forcing contact with the alleged incest leave your fate to that child, denies in fact, despises his word and questions his dignity separating it turn referent container believed him and protected him , his mother. -
Kink message will receive for the rest of his life to see that the child was of no talk and perverse parent can go on without any consequences or socially or conviction court . -
We should ask as a society what about those children and their future adult : . They be survivors of the tragic wickedness -
Parenting is the result of a construction with acts of tenderness, love , parenting is not a title , it's a lifetime achievement . A man who moves with her adult sexuality on child care should not " father " is a monster with a human mask . -
Children are the best makers of humanity , children are the ultimate source of wisdom in them is the meaning of human existence . Maybe destroying them is destroyed, the hope , the area where the man is "almost perfect."
And child sexual abuse is the destruction of a child. " You'll go through. We shall squeeze up to empty and then we shall fill you with ourselves " phrase from George Orwell's book" 1984 " cited by Leonard Shengold American psychoanalyst , professor of psychiatry at New York University when considered child sexual abuse among calling " murders of souls " a dramatic term used to describe acts that are deliberate attempts to eradicate or compromise the separate identity of another person . ( 12)
Sexual abuse of children is the advancement of adult power over the child as a seed of revolution, because each child carries within itself ínsita hope for change, every child is a new man with a new look, and power in the world fears that possibility.
Sexual abuse of a child is the destruction of the most authentic of that child, the breakdown of its original release.
The social message is clear : nothing can do for yourself as an adult because I occupy your body, filling you with guilt conscience , your hope because nobody cares and your speech because you prisoner confinement in secret: That is child sexual abuse.
A question of power and the power of the adult must follow even force their perverse imprint.
So the silent complicity of society against child sexual abuse and incest and complicity expressed springs institutional power trying to silence and intimidate their victims.
Every child is born a free man who shocked that adult power. Child sexual abuse and incest further seeks to corrupt the child and his innate revolutionary germ. So you have a mental crystallization of society regarding children . They are not believed -
Believe not check his word and deed happens. On this basis this cemented the impunity of child sexual abuse and incest . Society despises the word of children and is seduced by the social masks that knows assemble the aggressor.
Because it is "convenient" to the system not to believe . Consumers sex , pedophiles and sexual exploiters should remain unpunished and invoking the shadows. And in this task it is necessary to dismantle all sinister attempt to assert the story of child victims of rape, child sexual abuse and incest . We must discredit and must " put things in order" The rebind , forced child's contact with his assailant and joint custody in these cases is the institutional way of doing it .
It is therefore essential to believe child, take care of all danger and put solely on the look of the child abuser , the presumption of innocence applies to the child. When you start believing in their stories when their dignity is respected and your pain will be less impunity , the only way to clean up the company and its future bleak today . -
And finally and citing Consuelo Payueta Barea : " ... Just hope we as a species if we dare to open Pandora's Box . We can only establish a new egalitarian order , a majority of democratic age, a world that respects human rights, if we dare to discover the violence inflicted on women and children, the invisibility of those who exercise violence with impunity , only showing publicly who he is and what he does is real Pandora's box and only opened if there is hope ..." (13)
So the silent complicity of society against child sexual abuse and incest and complicity expressed springs institutional power trying to silence and intimidate their victims.
Every child is born a free man who shocked that adult power. Child sexual abuse and incest further seeks to corrupt the child and his innate revolutionary germ. So you have a mental crystallization of society regarding children . They are not believed -
Believe not check his word and deed happens. On this basis this cemented the impunity of child sexual abuse and incest . Society despises the word of children and is seduced by the social masks that knows assemble the aggressor.
Because it is "convenient" to the system not to believe . Consumers sex , pedophiles and sexual exploiters should remain unpunished and invoking the shadows. And in this task it is necessary to dismantle all sinister attempt to assert the story of child victims of rape, child sexual abuse and incest . We must discredit and must " put things in order" The rebind , forced child's contact with his assailant and joint custody in these cases is the institutional way of doing it .
It is therefore essential to believe child, take care of all danger and put solely on the look of the child abuser , the presumption of innocence applies to the child. When you start believing in their stories when their dignity is respected and your pain will be less impunity , the only way to clean up the company and its future bleak today . -
And finally and citing Consuelo Payueta Barea : " ... Just hope we as a species if we dare to open Pandora's Box . We can only establish a new egalitarian order , a majority of democratic age, a world that respects human rights, if we dare to discover the violence inflicted on women and children, the invisibility of those who exercise violence with impunity , only showing publicly who he is and what he does is real Pandora's box and only opened if there is hope ..." (13)
Graciela Dora Jofre
BIBLIOGRAPHY - .
( 1) the term child is used regardless of gender and gazing in concept to the adolescent. , . -
( 2) cited by Irene Intebi "Sexual Abuse in the Family " Ed.Granica
( 3) Maria Cecilia Lopez says in his book - " Sexual Abuse . How to prevent and detect Paidos Office - . " ... Psychologists know that one of the main characteristics of pedophiles is pride . This kind of perverse to believe anyone could be as smart as they are and that, unintentionally could become able to fool anyone underestimate because ... ")
(4 ) quotes Irene Intebi in op.citado pg.111 " . The specialist in treating sex offenders William E. Prendergast says "most abusers who met both in my private practice and my institutional experience were nice people : educated , gentlemen , cooperative , well-behaved and hard working . Do their best to please and be accepted ... "
(5) Consuelo Barea Payueta " The abuser and ex husband and father " Book Two of the Trilogy " And I will take away the children " pg.82 Barcelona 1912 et seq. )
(6 ) Marchiori Hilda " vulnerable victims . Child victims of sexual abuse "
( 7) Irene Intebi - ( . "Sexual Abuse in the Family " Ed.Granica " ) - expresses the matter:" ... For guys What is the ideal solution? Be believed ... , that the world of adults , especially those close to validate their perceptions and to take sides ... "
( - Mary Ann HOOPER , survivors of sexual abuse Mothers niños.Buenos Aires.Nueva Vision cit . Ruth Teubal in his work " The Mothers against intrafamily child sexual abuse of their children are they victims?
( 9) Calamandrei " Process and Justice " R.D.Arg . 1952 pg . Volume 1 pg.18
(10 ) Sonia Vaccaro - Barea Consuelo " The alleged parental alienation syndrome " Ed.Desclée of Boruwer , Barcelona 2009 pg.166 , 167 et seq. )
( 11) Volnovich " Sexual abuse in childhood . 3 - The revictimization Ed.Lumen.Buenos Aires - Mexico 2008)
(12 ) cited by Irene Intebi on " Child Sexual Abuse in the Family " Ed.Granica )
( 13) - Sonia Vaccaro - Barea Consuelo " The intended Parental Alienation Syndrome " Ed.Desclée Brouwer"
( 1) the term child is used regardless of gender and gazing in concept to the adolescent. , . -
( 2) cited by Irene Intebi "Sexual Abuse in the Family " Ed.Granica
( 3) Maria Cecilia Lopez says in his book - " Sexual Abuse . How to prevent and detect Paidos Office - . " ... Psychologists know that one of the main characteristics of pedophiles is pride . This kind of perverse to believe anyone could be as smart as they are and that, unintentionally could become able to fool anyone underestimate because ... ")
(4 ) quotes Irene Intebi in op.citado pg.111 " . The specialist in treating sex offenders William E. Prendergast says "most abusers who met both in my private practice and my institutional experience were nice people : educated , gentlemen , cooperative , well-behaved and hard working . Do their best to please and be accepted ... "
(5) Consuelo Barea Payueta " The abuser and ex husband and father " Book Two of the Trilogy " And I will take away the children " pg.82 Barcelona 1912 et seq. )
(6 ) Marchiori Hilda " vulnerable victims . Child victims of sexual abuse "
( 7) Irene Intebi - ( . "Sexual Abuse in the Family " Ed.Granica " ) - expresses the matter:" ... For guys What is the ideal solution? Be believed ... , that the world of adults , especially those close to validate their perceptions and to take sides ... "
( - Mary Ann HOOPER , survivors of sexual abuse Mothers niños.Buenos Aires.Nueva Vision cit . Ruth Teubal in his work " The Mothers against intrafamily child sexual abuse of their children are they victims?
( 9) Calamandrei " Process and Justice " R.D.Arg . 1952 pg . Volume 1 pg.18
(10 ) Sonia Vaccaro - Barea Consuelo " The alleged parental alienation syndrome " Ed.Desclée of Boruwer , Barcelona 2009 pg.166 , 167 et seq. )
( 11) Volnovich " Sexual abuse in childhood . 3 - The revictimization Ed.Lumen.Buenos Aires - Mexico 2008)
(12 ) cited by Irene Intebi on " Child Sexual Abuse in the Family " Ed.Granica )
( 13) - Sonia Vaccaro - Barea Consuelo " The intended Parental Alienation Syndrome " Ed.Desclée Brouwer"
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario